
Pate's Biggest Question For Top-10 Texas Isn't the Quarterback. It's the Line In Front of Him.
The Pate State Staff on why Pate keeps circling back to the trenches when everyone else is talking about hope, promise, and Arch Manning.
Pate went through the top 10 team by team looking for one question apiece. For Texas, he didn't pick the quarterback room, the schedule, or the hype. He picked the offensive line, and he backed it up with numbers instead of vibes.
Texas enters the season buried in preseason hype, the kind that comes with being a trendy pick to finally break through. Pate isn't fighting that. He's just not ignoring what happened up front last year, specifically in pass protection and the ground game, both of which lagged well behind the program's ceiling.
The Case
Pate was careful to frame this the right way before he ever got to the stat sheet. He's used this line on more than one team this preseason, and it applies here too. โRemember the rule that Mima always taught us. Questions are not weaknesses. Questions are questions. Weaknesses are weaknesses.โ That distinction matters. Pate isn't saying Texas has a bad line. He's saying nobody should assume the line problem from a year ago just evaporates because the hype cycle demands it.
Then came the numbers. โ61st in the country in sacks allowed per game.โ
For a preseason top-five program, that's the kind of stat that gets buried under highlight reels and recruiting rankings. Pate didn't let it get buried. He followed it immediately with the run game figure. โThey were 90th in overall rushing yards per game last year.โ
Here's the mechanism worth isolating. A line that can't consistently protect the pocket and can't consistently move a defense off the ball isn't failing at one job, it's failing at the job that sets up every other job on the offense. Protection buys the quarterback rhythm. Push up front buys play-action and manageable third downs. When both numbers sit in the bottom half of the country, the quarterback's ceiling gets capped no matter how gifted he is. Pate pointed straight at the closest evidence, a physical mismatch against Georgia that exposed exactly that gap. Texas recruited well and developed well at the position, by his account, but the program chose continuity over an overhaul. They liked what they had. That's a bet, not a certainty.
Credit where it's due on the other side of that bet: Pate isn't dismissing the hope. He said as much himself, that the promise is real and he's bought into plenty of it. The program didn't sit on its hands either. It kept its guys, trusted its developmental track, and is banking on year-over-year growth rather than a transfer portal reset. That's a defensible plan. It's just not a finished product yet, and Pate's question is whether one more offseason closes the gap against the teams Texas actually has to beat.
The Honest Complication
Here's what cuts against Pate's worry. Offensive line play is often the single most improvable unit in the sport year to year, especially when continuity is the plan rather than the accident. A group that returns starters, adds a full offseason of strength development, and gets another year in the same scheme frequently jumps multiple tiers without a single new face. If that happens at Texas, this question resolves itself by October and Pate's stat sheet becomes last year's business. Pate's own framework cuts both ways here. A question isn't a weakness, and questions get answered in both directions.
The Close
Texas doesn't have to prove it can outscore anybody in August. It has to prove its front five can hold up when someone lines up across from them and refuses to move. Pate flagged the exact proving ground without saying it outright: watch how that offensive line performs the moment Texas travels into a hostile, physical environment against a team built to win in the trenches. That tape will answer Pate's question long before the committee ever does.
Watch the Full Episode
Articles are drafted from Josh Pate's College Football Show under the site's editorial standards and monitored by the editorial team โ corrections are timestamped, never silent.