
Pate's Case: Texas Might Have the Best Team in the Country and Still Lose Three Games
Eight top-17 playoff-odds opponents, five road trips away from Austin — Pate argued the Longhorns' 2026 slate is brutal enough that a 9-3 finish wouldn't mean what people think it means.
Pate's specific claim: Texas has the toughest schedule in the country this year, and it's not close.
Texas arrives at the 2026 season with the kind of preseason buzz that usually ends in either a championship parade or a coaching search — Pate has floated them as a candidate for the best team in the country, full stop. That's the backdrop that makes his schedule argument matter. A roster that good, playing a slate that hard, changes what success and failure are supposed to look like in Austin.
Pate built the case conference by conference rather than defaulting to the usual SEC-and-Big-Ten pileup, and Texas topped the whole exercise.
"Texas may have the best team in the country this year. Uh they also, I think, have the toughest schedule in the country this year. They play eight of the top 17 teams in the FanDuel odds to make the playoffs. Incredible. And five of those games are away from Austin." That's not a cherry-picked road trip or two — that's a full season's worth of load-bearing games, and more than half the schedule sits outside Austin against contenders.
The stretch he singled out is the part that should worry Texas fans more than anyone.
Ohio State on the schedule, a trip to Knoxville, playing Oklahoma in Dallas, then having to close with road trips to LSU and Texas A&M. There's no soft landing in that run. Pate's point isn't that Texas can't handle it — it's that even a very good Texas team could get bruised by it, and the bruising wouldn't necessarily reflect the roster.
That's the crux of it. Pate isn't hedging on Texas talent. He's arguing that the schedule itself should reset what people are allowed to say about the season if the record comes in a little scuffed. A three-loss year against that gauntlet isn't the same conversation as a three-loss year against a normal slate, and Pate wants that distinction on the record before the losses happen, not after.
The honest complication
Pate's own framework has a built-in warning label, and he applied it two conferences later without seeming to notice it doubled back on Texas. Discussing Kentucky's closing stretch — Tennessee, Florida, Missouri, Vanderbilt — he said the quiet part out loud: preseason strength-of-schedule rankings prop teams up based on recruiting rankings and projection, and "by the end of the year some of it was fool's gold." He rattled off the exact ways that happens — a team not being as good as advertised, a quarterback battle that never resolves, a program a year removed from its best player.
The same logic applies to Texas whether Pate said it out loud there or not. "Eight of the top 17 teams in the FanDuel odds" is a snapshot in August. If Oklahoma's offense stalls, if Tennessee's quarterback room doesn't produce a difference-maker, if LSU or Texas A&M take a step back, that murderer's row on paper thins out by November — and the schedule Pate is calling the toughest in the country quietly becomes a lot more survivable. The whole exercise is built on odds that are, by definition, going to be wrong about somebody.
The kicker
Pate is right that nobody should judge Texas by a scoreboard alone this year — the gauntlet is real, and five road games against that level of competition would humble most rosters in the country. But he's also the one who taught the room, two conferences later, that a tough schedule in August is just a strong opinion with a deadline. Texas fans should remember both halves of that lesson before they decide what a 9-3 season actually means.
Watch the Full Episode
Articles are drafted from Josh Pate's College Football Show under the site's editorial standards and monitored by the editorial team — corrections are timestamped, never silent.