Ty’Anthony Smith’s 60 Tackles Leave Texas With an Unnamed Linebacker and a Faster Freshman Clock
Smith’s departure removes a 13-game starter who handled run fits, pressure, coverage and takeaways. Texas now has to decide whether to simplify the defense or put a young replacement into work before the room is ready.
Texas just lost the linebacker who made the most different kinds of plays. Ty’Anthony Smith is gone after a 2025 breakout, and the Longhorns have no publicly named replacement or timetable for the work he leaves behind. That forces a choice before the season arrives: shrink the defensive menu, or speed up a true freshman’s calendar and accept that the run fits may arrive late.
This is a front-seven problem first. The linebacker behind the linemen has to read the blocking picture, fit the open gap, carry a receiver when the call asks for it and still arrive when the defense sends pressure. Smith handled all four jobs last season. Texas can replace his spot on the depth chart. It can’t replace that range with a pencil mark.
Texas loses the linebacker who connected the calls
Smith played in 13 games in 2025 and finished with 60 tackles, 5.5 tackles for loss, two sacks, two forced fumbles, a fumble recovery, two interceptions and three passes defended. The stat line matters because it doesn’t describe one narrow linebacker. It describes the player who cleaned up runs, affected the quarterback and changed possessions.
A linebacker with that assignment spread gives a defense room to call more than its safest answer. He can fit the run without turning every passing down into a coverage tell. He can pressure without leaving the back end short-handed on every snap. He can make a mistake in the first picture and still recover before the play reaches the sideline.
That last part is where the loss gets expensive. Sixty tackles are a record of finished plays. The two interceptions and two forced fumbles show how often Smith turned a finished play into a new possession or a worse down for the offense. Texas now has to replace both the ordinary snaps and the unusual ones.
Pate has already argued that Texas could have a hellacious defensive line. That matters here. A strong line can keep a linebacker clean by occupying blockers and closing the first gap. It cannot make the linebacker identify the right gap, carry the right route or arrive on time. The big men can narrow the picture. They don’t fill it for him.
The run fit gets smaller before it gets better
The first adjustment will likely be practical rather than dramatic. Texas can ask the remaining linebackers to play more conservatively, keep the safety support closer to the box and reduce the number of calls that require one player to handle two threats. That can protect a young replacement from a bad read.
It also gives the offense a clue.
When the linebacker stays square to the run, the quarterback gets an easier throw behind him. When the linebacker widens to protect the pass, the running back gets a cleaner lane inside. That is the conflict Smith’s production allowed Texas to manage. A replacement who handles only one side of it makes the defensive call easier to attack.
Run fits are not a matter of standing in the right place after the ball carrier breaks through. The linebacker has to trigger before the crease is obvious. He has to fit off the defensive line’s first movement, keep his shoulders clean and close the gap without overrunning the play. A young player can know the call and still arrive one step late. One late step turns a two-yard run into a first down.
Texas can answer that with a more conservative front. Keep the linebacker inside. Bring fewer pressure looks. Ask the coverage shell to do more work. The defense may give up fewer assignment busts, but it also gives the quarterback a smaller set of problems. That is the scheme downgrade created by the calendar, not by a lack of ideas.
The alternative is more attractive and more dangerous. Texas could keep the wider menu and trust a young player to grow inside it. That preserves the pressure and coverage options. It also puts the new linebacker in the exact spots where hesitation becomes a crease, a missed check or a free release.
The first test will come when Texas faces a formation that can run either direction without changing personnel. If the replacement has to pause before fitting the gap, the front will tell the story before the box score does.
The replacement question has no name yet
Texas hasn’t announced whether Smith’s snaps will go to an existing linebacker, a new roster addition or a player who wasn’t expected to play major work this early. That missing name matters more than a broad statement about talent. Different replacements create different defenses.
A veteran who can handle the run may keep Texas steady between the tackles while giving up some of Smith’s coverage range. A better cover player may preserve the passing-down calls while forcing the front to defend more runs with fewer bodies. A true freshman may offer the speed to chase the play but still need the defense narrowed around him.
None of those possibilities is a forecast of a specific player. Texas has not supplied one. The public answer is still an open competition, which means the calendar is moving faster than the depth chart.
That speed changes the coaching job. If the staff chooses a freshman, the first goal cannot be matching every number Smith produced. It has to be getting the call right, fitting the assigned gap and finishing the ordinary play. The splash plays can wait. A defense that misses its run fit has already paid for the gamble before it gets a chance to create a turnover.
If the staff chooses an older player, the short-term trade may run the other way. Texas could gain cleaner communication and lose some of the movement that made Smith useful across the defense. The room would be steadier, but the playbook might still contract around what the replacement does best.
That is why the next depth chart announcement matters. It won’t just identify the linebacker standing beside the front. It will show whether Texas believes it can preserve Smith’s range or whether the defense has to protect a narrower role. A clean handoff would mean one player is ready to absorb the full job. An open competition would mean the snaps are still looking for a home.
Texas has less room for a quiet transition
The departure is reported to involve a personal matter, and Texas hasn’t announced further details. That limits the football forecast to the roster problem in front of the program. There is no public timeline to use, no replacement to grade and no reason to build a story around anything beyond the work Texas must now redistribute.
The Longhorns may have enough front-seven talent to absorb the loss. A productive defensive line would help. So would a linebacker who doesn’t need the defense simplified around him. The case for Texas survives if the replacement handles the first read, fits downhill and gives the secondary enough help to keep normal coverage calls alive.
But that answer has to show up in practice and then in the first run-heavy situation. Talent on the roster is not the same as a linebacker taking Smith’s snaps without changing the calls around him. One player has to prove he can hold the middle while still threatening the edge of the defense.
The attractive version of this Texas defense still exists. The line can create pressure. The linebackers can run. The secondary can benefit from a front that doesn’t give away easy throws. Smith’s departure doesn’t erase those pieces. It removes the player who tied several of them together.
That leaves Texas with a front seven that may have to choose between a smaller defensive menu and a faster freshman timeline. Either route can work. Neither comes without diminished run-fit discipline until the replacement proves he can play the whole job.
The first depth chart update should answer who gets the chance. The first offense that forces a run-pass conflict will answer whether Texas kept its defense or quietly rebuilt it around the hole. Follow the Texas team page for that depth chart change and the snap-by-snap answer once the season begins.
Articles are drafted from Josh Pate's College Football Show under the site's editorial standards and monitored by the editorial team — corrections are timestamped, never silent.
Oklahoma at No. 14: John Mateer's ceiling, the tight end fix, and the run game that decides the season